E
Erin Moran
marked this post as
complete
You can now hide data points from target graphs for sessions where the minimum number of trials wasn't met—so your graphs reflect meaningful data and the progress reports you share with insurance and families tell an accurate story.
"Hide if min trials not met" toggle — A new option in the Data Visibility section of target graph settings lets you filter out sessions where the trial count fell below the minimum defined in your Mastery Workflow.
Trials and Min. Trials columns in the graph table — The data table below the graph now shows how many trials were collected in each session alongside the minimum required, so you can see at a glance which sessions met the threshold.
"Below Min Trials" badge in session data review — After a session, targets that didn't meet the minimum trial count display a badge, making it easy to spot under-run targets without digging into the data.
Respects your Mastery Workflow configuration — The filter pulls the minimum trials value from the relevant Mastery Workflow, following the full inheritance chain (target workflow → parent target workflow → program workflow). If you update your workflow settings, the graph reflects the change immediately.
Pre-release data banner — When the toggle is on and your date range includes sessions from before this feature's release, a banner lets you know that older sessions can't be filtered and are displayed as-is.
This post was marked as
in progress
E
Erin Moran
Merged in a post:
Minimum Trials Toggle
E
Emily Summers
Would love to see a "toggle" feature where the BCBA can specify, when viewing the graph, if data points with fewer than the minimum trials should be shown or not.
Jill Umstattd
Merged in a post:
Option to set minimum number of trials required for data to graph
Lizzy Ruminski
Setting a minimum of trials in order for the data to graph would reduce the number of targets graphing with only one trial. This could be an option in target settings, along with mastery workflow and prompt hierarchy.
C
Christine Danh
Merged in a post:
Ability to Remove Outlier Data
S
Sarah Gearhart
I feel it would be helpful to either have ability to remove or "hide" outlier data (eg. low trial counts, errored data dates) so that graphs reflect more accurately in reporting.
For example, i've had some sessions where a program is set at 5 trials but there was only 1-2 opportunities which depicts highly variable on the graph compared to days in which the trial count was met.
H
Hector Estrada
Or potentially, to have a feature where it can add a sub note that can be clicked on to appear or disapear (this would assist us to analyze the data and also when we create phase change lines)
Jill Umstattd
marked this post as
under review
Nikolaj Hendriksen
Merged in a post:
Setting for Graphs - Not include incomplete data sets
H
Hannah Schademan, RBT
Currently, if a mastery criteria has a certain number of required trials each session's data is showing on the graph, regardless of whether enough targets were run, which can be misleading. It would be nice if there was a setting where you can exclude sessions that do not meet the minimum requirement.